A sign outside of a fast-food restaurant has sparked widespread debate on Twitter over everything from the minimum wage to working conditions in modern America.
Shared by Rep. David Rouzer (R-N.C.), the sign, placed outside of a Hardee’s, reveals how the establishment has been closed due to a lack of workers.
Rouzer argues that the business has been unable to hire new employees due to safeguards put in place by the federal government amid the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.
“This is what happens when you extend unemployment benefits for too long and add a $1400 stimulus payment to it,” Rouzer tweeted. “Right when employers need workers to fully open back up, few can be found.”
This is what happens when you extend unemployment benefits for too long and add a $1400 stimulus payment to it. Right when employers need workers to fully open back up, few can be found. pic.twitter.com/DlrQp8Vzw1
— David Rouzer (@RepDavidRouzer) April 30, 2021
But Rouzer’s interpretation of the sign was quickly met with backlash online, where users instead blamed low wages and poor working conditions.
“No. This is what happens when employers pay workers starvation wages with no benefits,” @GunneIsWarren said. “You don’t want to pay workers a living wage with decent benefits? Stay closed or do the work yourself.”
No. This is what happens when employers pay workers starvation wages with no benefits. You don’t want to pay workers a living wage with decent benefits? Stay closed or do the work yourself. https://t.co/SPXerLq90n
— Warren Gunnels (@GunnelsWarren) May 2, 2021
Others refuted Rouzer’s claims by noting that the $1,400 stimulus check wouldn’t even cover a single month’s rent for many Americans.
“$1,400 is less than a month’s rent. Not counting utilities,” @DogBarkingBees wrote. “And pretty sure unemployment benefits are there for people who lose their job, not people who just decide they want unemployment. Maybe companies should pay folks a livable wage instead of wasting paper.”
$1,400 is less than a month’s rent. Not counting utilities.
AdvertisementAnd pretty sure unemployment benefits are there for people who lose their job, not people who just decide they want unemployment.
Maybe companies should pay folks a livable wage instead of wasting paper. https://t.co/OB1iXl6tSY
— Steel A Jeeg – Punished Editor (@DogBarkingBees) May 1, 2021
Many also pointed to the free market, arguing that the working class had decided that being employed by the restaurant wasn’t worth it.
“This is the free market working, dumbass. If you don’t pay people enough they’re not gonna take the shitty job,” @BriannaWu wrote. “Sounds like you need to study economics.”
This is the free market working, dumbass. If you don’t pay people enough they’re not gonna take the shitty job.
Sounds like you need to study economics. https://t.co/cUgsqmtv45
— Brianna Wu (@BriannaWu) May 1, 2021
Advertisement
The Republican lawmaker was also accused of hypocrisy. Twitter users pointed out that conservatives have long claimed that fast-food jobs aren’t meant to be a full-time career.
“These are the same people y’all have been calling uneducated, unskilled, and unworthy of a living wage for years, now you’re mad ‘cause you want a burger and they dipped? Lol. Good for them,” @FuckMontanaaa said.
These are the same people y’all have been calling uneducated, unskilled, and unworthy of a living wage for years, now you’re mad ‘cause you want a burger and they dipped? Lol. Good for them. https://t.co/TMV5EkWaKq
— homo la flor. (@FuckMontanaaa) May 2, 2021
Lol remember when people were like “fast food service isn’t a career, you’re not supposed to make a living there” and now we’ve taken that to heart and they’re like “wait, no.” https://t.co/qenkGCM4VU
— Brendan Fraser Crane (@bf_crane) May 1, 2021
I thought “flipping burgers” was just a part-time jobs for teenagers and that’s why they don’t have to pay well? Last time I checked, most sixteen-year-olds don’t qualify unemployment or stimulus checks, so maybe Hardee’s just sucks. https://t.co/quuv3rIV6r
AdvertisementAdvertisement— Lilah Sturges – GIRL HAVEN OUT NOW! (@LilahSturges) May 1, 2021
Users alleging to be business owners themselves also claimed that they have seen an influx of inquiries for jobs, suggesting that the issue may be Hardee’s and not stimulus checks from months ago.
“Congressman, my small business received hundreds of applications for each job this year,” @DanPriceSeattle said. “Could it be that people don’t want to make minimum wage with no benefits and the $20 billion private equity group that owns Hardees refuses to pay people anything close to a living wage?”
Congressman, my small business received hundreds of applications for each job this year. Could it be that people don’t want to make minimum wage with no benefits and the $20 billion private equity group that owns Hardees refuses to pay people anything close to a living wage?
— Dan Price (@DanPriceSeattle) May 1, 2021
Advertisement
If you’re delusional enough to believe that people can live off unemployment benefits and a $1400 check, it’s no wonder you also believe people can live on $7.50 an hour.
— James Morrison (@JamesPMorrison) April 30, 2021
Not a living wage. Little to no benefits. Stressful work environment. Socially looked down upon. Often involves company attempting to gaslight employees. Bad hours. No PTO. Union busting.
but sure
It’s extended unemployment.
AdvertisementAdvertisement— Songbird (@BluehairCoffee) April 30, 2021
Whether the employment problem at the fast-food restaurant is an isolated issue or a sign of what’s to come remains unclear. Either way, the restaurant industry has taken a major hit since the coronavirus pandemic began.
This week’s top technology stories
*First Published: May 2, 2021, 1:33 pm
Mikael Thalen
Mikael Thalen is a tech and security reporter based in Seattle, covering social media, data breaches, hackers, and more.